Letter to the Editor: How a failed Bond election in another DFW city caused chaos  

Editorial Note: This letter comes from Sebrena Bohnsack who chaired the Community Affairs Commision of Bedford, Texas around the 2005 time frame. She tells us the consequences of a failed bond election in that city. Her opinions, as are all the opinions published by The Echo, are that of the author.

Dear Editor,

My husband and I have lived in Richardson for nearly four years and we are in total agreement with the bond election. We know first hand the devastating effects of the poor choice of misinformed citizens to oppose the funds required to keep a city well-maintained, safe and moving toward to  future.

I was previously involved in community politics and chaired the Bedford Community Affairs Commission prior to the city's 2005 capital improvements campaign.

I don't know if you remember Bedford, Texas making the news a few years ago? The city experienced the effects of CAVE (Citizens Against Virtually Everything) dweller politics, lost bond elections and a roll back tax that forced budget cuts, slashed vital services and caused layoffs of hard-working city employees.

Bedford made the national news when the public library, the first in Texas recorded  history, closed it's doors. Bedford could not even afford to mow the grass!

Watching my beloved city nearly collapse due to the fear and intimidation spread by a small, grumpy minority over a few extra cents a day is just not worth it! Can you give up Starbucks a couple of times a month for a better city? I certainly can.

By the way, if you don't think your vote is important, think again. The Bedford tax rollback provision passed by a mere 10 votes.

Please don't let our bond election for needed improvements go the way of CAVE dwellers.Do you want Richardson to become Bedford, Texas all over again? I certainly don't.

Vote "YES" in Richardson's 2010 Bond Election.

Sebrena Bohnsack
Richardson resident

Last Updated: Saturday, April 16, 2011
File Under: General News, Outside Richardson, City Hall, Letters, Editorials
Comments
By Charles Norwood @ Monday, May 03, 2010 8:57 PM
The biggest problem with Richardson is the fact the city is operated like Washington D. C. No term limits.
Once the council is elected they stay until they die or just get tired.
Still picking up garbage in the alleys with bags and
junk scattered up and down.

By Andrew Laska @ Monday, May 03, 2010 9:09 PM
Actually not at all.

This bond election is accountable and transparent. You get to see every item that you are voting for and the voters can vote directly for it. All the elected representatives have done is give the voters a choice. In fact, most items on this were driven by neighborhoods going directly to their elected and accountable representatives and demanding that these roads, alleys and other items be given a chance before the voters. If those items are approved by the voters then the municipality cannot deviate very far from the original line items.

I have never seen such an equivalent process in Washington.

By Andrew Laska @ Monday, May 03, 2010 9:09 PM
Lastly Richardson has term limits which was approved by the voters in 2007.

Click here to post a comment
Copyright © 2010 by the Richardson Echo

  |  Login